Did you hear it? The clarifying question…the laughter of recognition…the applause of approbation at seeing a colleague’s excellent work recognized…the intent…
TAA Upcoming Fall Webinars for Textbook & Academic Authors
Join us for these 60-minute live, interactive sessions that connect you to experts discussing a variety of topics designed especially…
The ultimate resource guide for completing your dissertation
Are you looking for the ultimate resource guide for completing your dissertation?
Join TAA’s Dissertators United Chapter and gain access to the resources you need to improve your writing, enhance your productivity, and ultimately complete your dissertation. Our resource list includes links to how-to articles, websites, blogs, books and apps that focus on:
8 Academic writing blogs you should be following
When trying to find relevant articles to share on our Twitter feed I seem to always go back to the…
2014 TAA Conference receives rave reviews
The 2014 TAA Conference was a big success! Attendees from across the country representing a variety of writing disciplines gathered…
How to navigate the peer review publishing process
When an author submits a manuscript to a scholarly journal, the manuscript will face one of three basic responses: accept, reject, or revise and resubmit. Samantha Elliott, editor-in-chief of the Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education (JMBE), and Jeffrey Arnett, editor of the Journal of Adolescent Research, offer the following information to guide you through the different responses you may receive from editors.
Accept/Accept with Minor Modifications
Manuscripts that fall into this category are exceptionally strong papers that received glowing peer reviews, and the only modifications needed might include clarification on certain points, or formatting issues specific to the journal. While this is every academic writer’s dream response, it is a very rare occurrence. If this happens to you, Elliott recommends that you celebrate, and then take a good look at the feedback you received to find out what impressed your reviewers. You can use this feedback to help shape future manuscripts.